In reference to the June 29 editorial, “Should the town ban pesticides,” I am a horticulturalist and a journeyman landscape gardener with 35 years experience maintaining public spaces in Alberta.
A ban on cosmetic pesticides is long overdue. The rationale is simple. Dandelions pose no health or safety risk. However, the pesticides used to control them provide a significant health risk especially to children and pets. The science is clear and the Canadian Association of Physicians agree. Only a ban can protect the public. The precautionary principle should prevail. Manufacturers must demonstrate that their pesticides are safe.
Cosmetic pesticides are harmful to humans, pets, bees and soils. Additionally, run off from lawns pollute our rivers. Have you ever considered the impact on your indoor air quality after you or your pet inadvertently walk through a treated area and then transfer the active ingredient to your carpets or furniture?
As Grounds Co-ordinator (retired) at Rocky View Schools, I helped initiate a Board policy that banned cosmetic pesticides and chemical fertilizers. We received much more positive than negative feedback. More importantly, I knew the kids were playing in a safe environment.
Research has shown that reasonable evidence of harm exists. Canadians famously search for the general good. We need to look out for our community. Logic tells us not to take risks with our health and to refrain from using something that is harmful.
What is a safe level of pesticides in your body? Only a ban ensures that there is no further exposure.
Steve Repic
