The stretch of semi-rural land on No. 6 Road in Richmond, B.C., is home to blueberry farms, multimillion-dollar mansions and an 18-hole golf course.
Those properties are all now encompassed by a landmark Aboriginal title claim that was successfully established by the Cowichan Nation last week.
The ruling in B.C. Supreme Court confirmed Cowichan Aboriginal title and fishing rights over the stretch of land on Lulu Island next to the south arm of the Fraser River where the nation had a summer village where members fished for salmon.
Now it is occupied by Crown and City of Richmond holdings — as well as private properties that include a 10,600 square-foot home with 11 bathrooms and an official valuation of $7.78 million, other multimillion-dollar homes and the Country Meadows Golf Course.
The ruling by Justice Barbara Young says the Cowichan did not seek a declaration that private titles in the area were "defective and invalid," unlike those for the land owned by the Crown and city that makes up much of the claim.
But the judge ruled the province has a duty to negotiate with the nation when it comes to the private land, whose titles were granted in what she called an unjustifiable infringement of the Cowichan’s Aboriginal title.
Lawyer David Robbins, who represented the Cowichan in the trial that lasted more than 500 days, said Tuesday that the nation did not bring its case against private titleholders "and did not seek to invalidate their interests in this case."
"It is the Crown in right of British Columbia that has the legal relationship with the holders of private fee simple interests. The Cowichan Nation has no direct relationship with those titleholders," he said.
The Ministry of Attorney General said in a statement that it was "committed to protecting and upholding private property rights while advancing the critical work of reconciliation."
The ministry said the number of private properties encompassed by the claim area was being assessed.
But a map of the Cowichan title lands that was part of the court ruling, combined with publicly available land documents, identify the mansions and other properties along Richmond's No. 6 Road, south of Blundell Road.
Harry Hogler co-owns the Country Meadows Golf Course and lives across the road in a 8,900 square-foot home, featuring a fountain and a classic car in the circular driveway.
Hogler declined to be interviewed but said he was aware of the ruling and was "not worried."
However, B.C. Attorney General Niki Sharma said on Monday that the case could have "significant unintended consequences" for private property rights in the province, and the government would appeal the ruling.
That's no surprise to Robin Junger, a lawyer with McMillan LLP focused on an Indigenous and environmental law.
He said if the decision stands it will have “massive implications” and “could undermine the whole system of land ownership in British Columbia.”
“Although the court was only asked to give a ‘declaration’ in relation to lands held by the City of Richmond and the Government of Canada, the reasoning of the court isn't limited to those lands,” he said.
Junger said he believes the decision would likely be overturned on appeal and go all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.
He said if he were a property owner he would not panic.
Junger said a judge only goes by what parties argue in a case, adding he believes there are “reasonable grounds to pursue” an appeal on the key question of whether B.C. extinguished Aboriginal title when it issued private fee simple land titles, and whether it had the authority to do so.
“If you look very closely at the decision, you'll see that the B.C. government, and in fact the Government of Canada, did not argue that these rights were extinguished. They declined to make that argument. Only the City of Richmond made that argument,” he said.
“So, I think there's a lot of fertile ground to follow on an appeal, and we'll see where it lands.”
Some other residents of No. 6 Road whose homes are within the Cowichan title lands said they were aware of the ruling, while others were not.
One resident arriving at a home valued at more than $4.1 million said Tuesday that he would "fight" the ruling. He declined to be identified or to give a longer interview.
Nearby, an elderly woman was selling blueberries outside a large stone home. She said in Mandarin that her son owned the home but she did not think he was aware of the ruling.
At one of the most expensive homes in the neighbourhood, according to BC Assessment, a woman who was driving out of the property said it was owned by a friend who was in China. She said she was unaware of the court ruling.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025
Ashley Joannou and Nono Shen, The Canadian Press
